Gambaran Kualitas Hidup Pasien Fraktur Femur Pasca Operasi

Ilham Devirxa Jusaf, Ridwan Balatif

Abstract

Objective: To describe the quality of life in postoperative femoral fracture patients. Methods: This study is a descriptive study with a cross-sectional method. The sample in this study were patients diagnosed with femoral fractures and had surgery at Haji Adam Malik General Hospital Medan from the period July 2015 to December 2018. Data on patient characteristics were taken from medical records while data regarding the quality of life of patients were taken directly by researchers by interviewing patients by telephone. Quality of life was measured using the short form -36 (SF-36). Results: Most of the patients were male (81.5%), with an age range of 25-34 years being the largest age (29.6%) of femoral fracture cases in this study. The most common cause of femoral fractures was traffic accidents (85.2%). The most locations of femur fractures were in the subtrochanteric area and were not specific (25.9%). The most common type of fracture was closed fracture (66.7%). From the results of the assessment of the quality of life subvariable, almost all variables have good scores except vitality. Conclusion: Overall the patient's quality of life variable, about 59.3% of postoperative femoral fracture patients had a good quality of life.

Keywords

characteristic; quality of life; femoral fracture; short form 36

Full Text:

PDF

References

Gueorguiev B, T. Moriarty FT, Stoddart M, Acklin YP, Richards RG, Whitehouse M. Principles of Fractures. In: Blom A, Warwick D, Whitehouse M (eds). Apley and Solomon’s System of Orthopaedics and Trauma. 10th ed. Florida: CRC Press; 2018

Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Laporan Nasional Riset Kesehatan Dasar (Riskesdas) 2013

Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Laporan Nasional Riset Kesehatan Dasar (Riskesdas) 2018

Noorisa R, Apriliwati D, Aziz A, Bayusentono S. The Characteristic of Patients with Femoral Fracture in Department of Othopaedic and Traumatology RSUD Dr. Soetomo Surabaya 2013-2016. Journal of Orthopaedi & Traumatology Surabaya. 2017: 6(1). Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/joints.v6i1.2017.1-11

Denisiuk M, Afsari A. Femoral Shaft Fractures. [Updated 2021 Jan 9]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK556057/

Kon E, Altadonna G, Filardo G, Matteo B. Di, Marcacci M. Knee scoring system. In: Bentley G (eds). European Surgical Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 2014. Berlin: Springer, pp. 3371-88

Andriandi. Karakteristik Penderita Fraktur Femur di RSUP Haji Adam Malik Medan Periode Januari 2009-Desember 2010. Departemen Ortopedi dan Traumatologi. Repositori USU. 2012

Anyaehie UE, Ejimofor OC, Akpuaka FC, Nwadinigwe CU. Pattern of femoral fractures and associated injuries in a Nigerian tertiary trauma centre. Niger J Clin Pract. 2015;18(4):462-6. doi: 10.4103/1119-3077.151761.

Dwipayana AANK, Premana KY, Wisnawan IMY. Characteristics of femur fracture patients at Sanjiwani general hospital Gianyar in 2019. Int J Res Med Sci. 2021; 9(2): 334-337. Doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20210048

Demirtas A, Azboy I, Alemdar C, et al. Functional outcomes and quality of life in adult ipsilateral femur and tibia fractures. J Orthop Translat. 2018;16:53-61. doi:10.1016/j.jot.2018.08.002



-->